Friday, October 5, 2007

A taste of Jed McKenna

Here is an article by Jed McKenna. It gives the flavor of his books quite nicely:

The Bottom Line
By Jed McKenna


Cogito ergo sum: I think, therefore I am.That is all ye know on earth; And all ye need to know.

Whadda ya know?

Seriously. With absolute certainty, what do you know? Put aside all opinions, beliefs and theories for a moment and address this one straight question: What do you know for sure? Or, as Thoreau put it:

Let us settle ourselves, and work and wedge our feet downward through the mud and slush of opinion, and prejudice, and tradition, and delusion, and appearance, that alluvion which covers the globe... through church and state, through poetry and philosophy and religion, till we come to a hard bottom and rocks in place, which we can call reality, and say, This is, and no mistake; and then begin...

In other words, let's cut the crap and figure out what's real. The cogito does exactly that, and it's very simple. The question is: What do you know?
The answer is: I Am.
All other so-called facts are really non-facts and belong in the category of consensual reality and relative truth, i.e., unreal reality and untrue truth.

Cogito Ergo Sum

Cogito ergo sum is the equation that proves the fact. But first, before we go on, let's ask what else we know. What else can be said for certain? Nothing. We don't know anything else. And that's the real point of the cogito. The importance of I Am isn't that it's a fact, but that it's the only fact. I Am is the only thing anyone has ever known or will ever know. Everything else, all religion and philosophy and science, is nothing more than dream interpretation. There is no other fact than I Am. The cogito is the seed of the thought that destroys the universe. Beyond the cogito, nothing is known. Beyond the cogito, nothing can be known. Except I Am, no one knows anything. No man or god can claim to know more. No God or array of gods can exist or be imagined that know more than this one thing: I Am.

We can't avoid letting this topic drift briefly into the Christian realm. When Moses asked God His name, God answered, "I am that I am." The name God gives for Himself is I Am.
Note that I Am is unconjugatible. It allows of no variation. God doesn't say, "My name is I Am, but you can call me You Are, or He Is." The cogito, the I Am equation, does not extend beyond one's own subjective knowing. I can say I Am and know it as truth, but I can't say you are, he is, she is, we are, they are, it is, etc. I know I exist and nothing else. Understood thusly, I Am, aka God, truly is the Alpha and the Omega; the entirety of being, of knowledge, of the known universe, of you.

The Line Is Drawn

The cogito is the line between fantasy and reality. On one side of the cogito is a universe of beliefs and ideas and theories. To cross the line is to leave all that behind. No theory, concept, belief, opinion or debate can have any possible basis in reality once the ramifications of the cogito have fully saturated the mind. No dialogue can take place across that line because nothing that makes sense on either side makes sense on the other. We all think we know what the cogito means; this is an invitation to challenge that assumption. If professors of philosophy truly understood it, they wouldn't be professors of philosophy. Alfred North Whitehead said that all philosophy is a footnote to Plato, but all philosophy, Plato included, is rendered obsolete and irrelevant by Descartes. Nothing but the subjective I Am is true, so what's the point of prattling on?

The cogito isn't a mere thought or an idea, it is an ego-eating virus that, properly incubated and nurtured, will eventually devour all illusion. Once we know the cogito, we can begin systematically unknowing everything we think we know, and unraveling the self we think we are.

Life is but a Dream

There is no such thing as objective reality. Two cannot be proven. Nothing can be shown to exist. Time and space, love and hate, good and evil, cause and effect, are all just ideas. Anyone who says they know anything is really saying they don't know the only thing. The greatest religious and philosophical thoughts and ideas in the history of man contain no more truth than the bleating of sheep. The greatest books are no more authoritative than the greatest luncheon meats.

No one knows anything.
Disprove it for Yourself

Anyone wishing to deny these statements about the meaning of the cogito need merely prove that something, anything, is true. By all means, give it a try, dash your head upon it, but it can't be done. Cogito ergo sum, however, isn't the endpoint of inquiry, it's the starting point; it's a tool that helps us see, without intermediaries, exactly what is true and what isn't, and that puts it right up there with fire and the wheel.

About the Author: Jed McKenna is the author of The Enlightenment Trilogy — Spiritual Enlightenment: The Damnedest Thing, Spiritually Incorrect Enlightenment, and Spiritual Warfare — published by Wisefool Press. Articles, books and more at our website: http://www.WisefoolPress.com

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is patent nonsense by someone who's read some Advaita (Nisargadatta or Tolle or Adamson, say) and just doesn't get it. All this going on about 'the cogito'?!? Give me a break. He seems to think cogito means I Am. Even if he can't decipher Latin, he should have an editor who can. If there were any real understanding here He would be pointing out the error in Cogito Ergo Sum and turning it around. The I Am is. Thinking is an ephemeral and inconsequential product of transient minds.

Wally Bertone

Anonymous said...

"Forgive then Father, for they know way too much about what they do". (And forgive me for my own bogus Latin)

Sounds like Wally still has a lot to unlearn...God, and I even used to be like him too! Maybe even worse, though definitely more clever.

"Thinking is an ephemeral and inconsequential product of transient minds" - Now there's a thought! I couldn't agree more!

John said...

This controversy (and the various interpretations) seems to be pretty well treated in the Wikipedia article on Cogito Ergo Sum:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogito_ergo_sum

Anonymous said...

You're right and I appreciate the clarification. Even Descartes moved away from cogito ergo sum pretty quickly. "Jed McKenna" using it as a pointing device seems less than effective. I am therefore I think (pee, get born, lose my leaves in the fall, watch TV, whatever) seems more useful. Also there is so much that is patently false in his books - fantasy and fiction masquerading as truth - I find them tiring. Might as well save your money and watch Days of Our Lives.

Wally

Anonymous said...

Looks like ego's replying. And what did Jed McKenna say about ego's? :-)

TOMMY TIGER said...

yes ego compares concepts and lives on symbols Jed's books are the real deal on enlightenment but of course not what ego likes to hear.Out of the thousand books his are the best I've read. He doesn't water it down with mammy Bamby bull and he uses great examples of the process. thanks

Anonymous said...

Read or get his audio books then decide. I have found he has moved me on in the spiritual journey. I would also highly recommend Richard Rose's teachings.

Rick Vanner

Anonymous said...

voicing (or typing) an opinion is just backing up your own delusions of grandeur. Damn! I've still some got some work to do then :)

Unknown said...

All these opinions come from were? Doesn't seem to manner who said what, someone knows differently.

It always depends on you..and only you can save you.